I wanted to take a
moment to talk about something I do that I think is fairly unique and how it
can be applied beyond my specific instance.
As a quick
refresher, I teach a class called Beethoven's Buddies Clementi's Colorful
Chimes Class (BB Chimes). In this class, kids play hand chimes that typically
look like this.
However, mine look like this
What are those
colors for you ask? Well I use the colors to help students recognize their note
in relation to that color. For further example. My "scores" look
something like this.
There are a couple
things to notice beyond just the colors, so lets get those out of the way.
First is the fact that the time signature is notated as a number over a quarter
note instead of another number. This means of notation is common enough that we
don't need to spend too much time on it. Next is the use of numbers inside of
the colored Quarter Notes. The numbers directly correspond with the octave
numbers notated on the Chimes themselves. Unfortunately, the picture I used
above was a work in progress picture of the chimes. Meaning I was changing from
the dots to bands, and the numbers 1, 2, 3, to the octave numbers.
One more notable
aspect of this style of notation is the use of standard notation. The quarter
notes resemble quarter notes, the overall structure looks identical to a single
line staff and the quarter rests look like rests. These are important because they
are subconsciously helping the students recognize music.
With all of that
said, I want to focus on the aspect of colors and melodic notation.
Why colors? Why not
just make the students read regular notation?
Well let me tell
you.
In the disabilities
community, the most prevalent means of teaching is visual. One example of
visual learning would be Boardmaker. Boardmaker is a tool utilized in the
special education world to reinforce concepts such as sit, their turn, my turn,
I'm mad, etc. the reason these are so valuable is because the child can SEE
what is happening instead of having to infer what is going to happen. Does this
make sense? So when we remove this idea of language, and instead focus on
visual recognition, students can experience a making music and understanding music at an accelerated pace
We now need to ask,
if colors are so good, how do we know what colors to use?
There is no agreed
upon color scheme for this next part, but I propose using the following.
C: Red
D: Orange
E: Yellow
F: Green
G: Light Blue
A: Dark Blue
B: Purple.
First off, this
follows the idea of a rainbow starting at C. Second, if you have students who
do not play your hand chimes, hand bells will often come in this color scheme
as well. In the interest of inclusion, WE SHOULD STANDARDIZE THIS!
How else can color
assist in musical learning?
Lets break this
down. When we are tasked with a challenging musical concept, do we just
continue to grit our teeth and push through to learn it?
NO! NOT AT ALL!!
We slow down, we
break it down, we deconstruct it. This begs the question then, what are we
deconstructing by using colors. Well, we are removing the brains need to
respond to two different languages (Rhythm and pitch) and are instead
responding to one language (Rhythm) and recognizing something else (Color).
We can take this a
step further by beginning to also implement color into standard staff notation
which would look like this.
Notice how we are
combining the colors with standard notation. If we already know how to read
colors, than we can easily move to reading this because we have something to
recognize.
Now music is
definitely all about inclusivity, so why don't we make learning music more
inclusive?
Bold statement, I
know. But we NEED to be thinking of alternative means of music education for
ALL TYPES of people. Not just the ones that can "understand" the
regular way of learning. (I'm looking at you Every Good Boat Does Float….. )
This is a lot, but
just some of my thoughts on alternative music education. Specifically, using
colors to help learn music.
Plus, you get some
pictures to look at.
Cheers,
Noel
Comments
Post a Comment